Sunday Salon: One or More Books at a Time?
Posted by Cottontimer on 06 Apr 2008 | Tagged as: Reading
I used to be loyal. Loyal to my friends and family, of course. But also loyal to just one book at a time. Somehow, over the last few months, I’ve fallen into the habit of having more than one book in my currently-reading list.
I am currently reading:
1. Voyager by Diana Gabaldon - Third in the Outlander series. I had to take a break from the series after reading books 1 and 2 because each one is so long. This one is just a tad over 1,000 pages and amusingly, there’s a dialogue early on in the book about whether lengthy books are more or less worthy of reading thus justifying Gabaldon’s own style of writing.
“Do you think that the size of the book is justified by the complexity of the story?” Grey asked, leaning forward to light a cheroot from the candle on the sideboard. “It must after all be a great expense to the publisher, as well as requiring a substantial effort from the reader, a book of that length.”
<snip>
“What is it–twelve hundred pages? Aye, I think so. After all, it is difficult to sum up the complications of a life in a short space with any hope of constructing an accurate account.” [Fraser replied]
“True. I have heard the point made, though, that the novelist’s skill lies in the artful selection of detail. Do you not suppose that a volume of such length may indicate a lack of discipline in such selection, and hence a lack of skill?”
Fraser considered, sipping the ruby liquid slowly.
“I have seen books where that is the case, to be sure,” he said. “An author seeks by sheer inundation of detail to overwhelm the reader into belief. In this case, however, I think it isna so. Each character is most carefully considered, and all the incidents chosen seem necessary to the story. No, I think it is true that some stories simply require a greater space in which to be told.” He took another sip and laughed.
I must agree. Gabaldon’s books haven’t felt tedious in the least although I did need a break from the whole 18th century Scotland thing after immersing myself in the world for a couple of weeks. Although, this is probably because I’m used to alternating between fiction and nonfiction.
2. Fermat’s Last Theorem by Simon Singh - This book is deceptively simple. I can’t seem to read more than 20-30 pages before getting overwhelmed by the math. I’m not scared of math by any means but I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite subject either.
3. Queen Bee Mums and Kingpin Dads (the British version hence the “mums” instead of “moms”) by Rosalind Wiseman - Absolutely hilarious and many parts ring true. It probably applies even more to parents of pre-teens and teenagers. I’ve been keeping this book in my bag to read while I’m out and about because it doesn’t take a lot of concentration and is highly entertaining.
4. The Changing Face of China by John Gittings - Still trudging through this book. I thought it would have more about the current situation in China. Instead, there’s loads about communist history during the Mao era.
5. A Long Way Down by Nick Hornby - Probably a quick read but I haven’t clicked with any of the characters. Maybe I’ll make this my bathroom book.
How many books do you have going at one time?
~~~~~
Join us at The Sunday Salon!
Related Posts:
Sunday Salon: Books Weighing Me Down...
Sunday Salon PostSecret...
Less School Equals More Happiness?...
The Sunday Salon for 28 October 2007...
Sunday Salon: Decluttering Books?!...
Sunday Salon: Books Read In The Year After Having a Baby...
Sunday Salon: On To Purgatory...
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
21 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.





I am a monogamous reader - only one book at a time. I am amazed at people who can read multiple books simulatenously. I could never keep the storylines straight!
Happy Sunday!
Jill
http://mrstreme.livejournal.com
Hi Jill! Maybe it’s easier b/c I tend to switch between fiction and nonfiction?
I don’t actually know how many I’m reading right now. I picked up my clutter a couple weeks back (had some people coming in to give estimates on replacing windows, and well, my friends are allowed to see my clutter, but not strangers! lol)
This means my books all got re-shelved…
I do have a couple gardening books on the side table here in the living-room, and ‘The Name of the Rose’ on my bedside table (it wanders around the house, last night I was reading before bed).
I know I’ve been slowly working through some cookbooks and books on herbs, and I started ‘The Chronicles of the Cheysuli’ by Jennifer Roberson a while back and haven’t gotten through the first omnibus yet (there are FOUR omnibus tomes for the series! ack.)
I also started a re-read of the Little House on the Prairie books this winter, as well as the Tolkien books, and haven’t gotten very far.
I know I’m forgetting books… if they were still laying about in cluttery piles I could tell you my whole list!
Hi Deb,
lol @ clearing clutter for strangers
I’ve developed a habit of leaving books and magazines next to my work area so that I can type in excerpts. Of course I usually fall behind so then I have mounds to clear. AHHH!!
I’ve never managed to pick up the skill of reading more than one book at a time. I think it’s because I get so involved in the fictional world that I would become completely disorientated if I tried world hopping. I’d never be quite certain where I was.
Ann, I suppose it depends on how engrossed you get in the book! Some fiction leaves me thinking even when I’m not reading and others…I can’t even get into it when I am actively reading.
I always have several books on the go at the same time - currently I’m reading 5, all at different stages, so that when I finish one book I still have books to read before I decide which one to start next.
I’ve read several of the Outlander series, but had to take a break because I found I wasn’t reading any thing else and I craved other books.
BooksPlease, Once upon a time if I heard someone was reading 5 books at a go, my eyes would bug out. Now I count myself as one of you!
Agree with the Outlander series. I took a 3 week break after reading #1 and #2. I will probably take a short break to finish a non-fiction after I’m done with #3.
Never more than one at a time, I’m afraid. Just can’t do it.
frumiousb, You don’t have the chance to read more than one book at a time. One blink and you’ve already finished the one in your hand! You are THE definition of a (hyper)avid reader.
I don’t seem to get much time to read anymore. I read Fermat’s Last Theorem many years ago, though, and really liked it. I also read a Long Way Down and didn’t really. That’s not one of Hornby’s best, in my opinion.
Abigail, So are you giving me permission to toss Long Way Down? heh I think it could probably be a quick weekend read. I’d never read any of his books before and others are big fans so I thought I’d try it. So far, not too into it.
Yes, I am, especially if that’s your first book of his. Start with High Fidelity or About a Boy instead.
I used to be monogamous, too… But now I read about three concurrently — I create kits for book clubs, so I’m usually reading a book for a customer (Snow Flower and the Secret Fan this week), then a book for my own pleasure (Man Gone Down currently), plus a book on tape in the car while I drive (just finished Amsterdam). Every once in a while I’ll throw in a work of non-fiction, too (like Tolle’s book right now). I actually find I like the variety of polygamy!
Hi Kristen, Creating kits for book clubs sounds so interesting! Have you blogged about that process before? Come leave us a link so we can learn more.
I usually have at least 3-6 books on the go at one time, although I may focus more heavily on one or another. It’s a very practical skill, I think, especially given that I’m in school and ought to be reading a certain number of books per week for various different courses.
Right now I’m reading the following:
- Atonement, by Ian McEwan
- The War of the Worlds, by H.G. Wells
- Cymbeline, by Wm. Shakespeare
- Letter Perfect, by David Sacks
- Surprised by Joy, by C.S. Lewis
- Agnes Grey, by Anne Bronte
- Lolita, by Nabukov
I think that’s it at the moment.
Lewis and Sacks both I haven’t picked up in a while, but I’m smack in the middle of both of them. The Shakespeare and Wells are for school, and the McEwan, Nabukov, and Bronte are for pleasure.
I like reading multiple books at once because I can be choosy according to my mood, the transportability of individual books, and such-like.
Christine, I agree with you esp. on transportability. I take public transportation on weekdays and couldn’t manage to deal with a large book plus all the other stuff I’ve got to carry plus my big 8-month pregnant belly!
I’ve never been monogamous. I usually have half a dozen different books going at once. Often they end up scattered around the house and I just pick up whichever is nearest.
Julie, I have often surprised myself with the books I find in odd corners. Some have been abandoned without a second thought!
I usually have a few on the go - I think about 4 at the moment? A novel, something non-fiction, and currently a book of short stories and a parenting one too.
Lisa, I almost always have a book to help me with parenting as well. Some are not directly related to parenting, such as Social Intelligence by Daniel Goleman, but they are all helpful in trying to understand the little devils’ psyche.