Alphabetizing Names
Posted by Cottontimer on 15 Apr 2006 | Tagged as: Thoughts
On my first visit to Singapore over 10 years ago, I couldn’t find anything in Tower Records. I was looking for artists under their last name when everything was alphabetized by their first. Back then, it seemed like a weird way of doing things but now it’s much more common. Take a look at the list of b5media.com bloggers on the sidebar. It threw me for a second.
The golden rule (and I so love rules) for alphabetizing names is to alphabetize according to the last name first, then the first name, then any initial. The Indiana Commission on Public Records has further details on how to alphabetize all the various permutations of names. None of the them alphabetize first names before last names.
There’s a good explanation for why music stores might want to alphabetize by first name - a lot of artists don’t bother using their last names at all. But, in my opinion, alphabetizing by first names in general signals a growing trend towards casual relationships. Or maybe it shows a de-emphasis in our society on familial affiliations. We are more independent than we used to be, less tied to our family identity. But what do I know?!
We address almost everyone we meet by their first names almost from the start of our relationship. Online, we often don’t know a person’s real name let alone their last name. The most confusing is explaining to kids how they should address me or other adults. I’m ok with them calling me by my first name but it seems a little awkward when they should be learning how to treat others with respect. I suppose as long as they’re not calling me a bad name, it should be ok. At Stephen’s age, we often just say Lucas’s mommy or Victoria’s mommy. And that, again, is only going by first name.
I can imagine one of these days not using surnames at all. We would have a firstname/nickname/handle and the way to really distinguish ourselves would be through an ID number like our passport or social security number. Maybe it’s a bizarre idea. Almost as bizarre as alphabetizing by our first names.
Related Posts:
Hyphenated Names...
Is your name too masculine or feminine?...
How does your name stack up?...
Punny Shop Names...
Dee-ablo or Die-ablo?...
Unforgettable...
BAD and Strange...
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
3 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.




Everyone in college, at work, and all the students I deal with know me as Smitha and Smitha alone. I never bother mentioning my last name as it leaves people baffled (it’s 12 letters long). And it has gotten to a point if people try calling me by my family name it takes me a few minutes to respond!
But I have been lucky though that there were no other Smitha’s to confuse me with. In India we have a common habit of just initialing our family name.
Here in KL, as we enter student databases what drives me nuts is the Chinese names. Some of the Chinese community put their first names first, some put their family names first. When they have to fill out the application forms, they somehow can’t be bothered and just put their full name as first name line. So, I have to often guess from the sounds of it (or check with my colleague).
Indians from India have the same issue as well…
For my thesis, I have to use the Thurembian style of referencing, as opposed to APA that I was so used to. In this style they put first name, middle initial, and last name and alphabetice based on first name. Now, I don’t know about you, but for authors I remember family names more than I do first names! yeeeks… consistency…i wish there was consistency when it came to this…
Hi, you are invited to Singapore Largest Parenting Website at http://www.idobaby.com
I saw that list and was confused at first too! It drives me a little nuts, to be honest. It should be alphabetized as Last name, first name. I look for music that way too alas. It helps when the group/artist just uses one name. LOL